Currently these rubrics are tools in the research and development stage. This research has been approved by USciences’ IRB. Phyllis Blumberg would like feedback on its use. (Use the feedback form provided.) She also needs to validate these rubrics. Validation can only occur if faculty send their completed rubrics and supporting documentation to Phyllis for further analyses. If a faculty member chooses to send this material to Phyllis, she will ask that person to sign a release form.
There are four different rubric forms for different types of teaching: 1) classroom single, laboratory or online teaching, 2) mentoring research, 3) precepting clinical students or for experiential teaching and 4) classroom multiple instructor. Only complete the relevant forms. The forms also contain essential and optional components. Faculty should also include documentation to provide support for the self-assessment ratings. The fourth document explains supporting validation information.
Any questions about using these rubrics should be directed to Phyllis Blumberg (x1167, p.blumbe@usp.edu).
A Developmental Tool for Improving Classroom Single, Laboratory or Online Teaching©
A Developmental Tool for Improving Mentoring Students in Research.©
A Developmental
Tool for Clinical Teaching or for Preceptors©
A
Developmental Tool for multi-instructor course©
Supporting Validity Information for these Rubrics
Feedback to solicit from faculty who completed the teaching evaluation rubrics